More than a feeling? What does compassion in healthcare 'look like' to patients?

OBJECTIVE: Compassion is important to patients and their families, predicts positive patient and practitioner outcomes, and is a professional requirement of physicians around the globe. Yet, despite the value placed on compassion, the empirical study of compassion remains in its infancy and little is known regarding what compassion 'looks like' to patients. The current study addresses limitations in prior work by asking patients what physicians do that helps them feel cared for. METHODS: Topic modelling analysis was employed to identify empirical commonalities in the text responses of 767 patients describing physician behaviours that led to their feeling cared for. RESULTS: Descriptively, seven meaningful groupings of physician actions experienced as compassion emerged: listening and paying attention (71% of responses), following-up and running tests (11%), continuity and holistic care (8%), respecting preferences (4%), genuine understanding (2%), body language and empathy (2%) and counselling and advocacy (1%). CONCLUSION: These findings supplement prior work by identifying concrete actions that are experienced as caring by patients. These early data may provide clinicians with useful information to enhance their ability to customize care, strengthen patient-physician relationships and, ultimately, practice medicine in a way that is experienced as compassionate by patients. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study involves the analysis of data provided by a diverse sample of patients from the general community population of New Zealand.

Supportive care and osteopathic medicine in pediatric oncology: perspectives of current oncology clinicians, caregivers, and patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Many children receiving chemotherapy struggle with therapy-induced side effects. To date, there has been no literature investigating the needs, knowledge, or implementation of osteopathic manipulative treatments (OMT) as a supportive care option in pediatric oncology. We hypothesized that pediatric oncology clinicians, caregivers, and patients have (a) limited knowledge of OMT and (b) dissatisfaction with current supportive care options and (c) would be interested in having OMT available during chemotherapy, once educated. METHODS: Participants included three cohorts: (1) children aged ≥ 9 years, diagnosed with cancer and actively receiving chemotherapy; (2) their caregivers; and (3) oncology clinicians at Nationwide Children's Hospital. Participants completed 1:1 semi-structured interviews, which were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic content regarding their perception of supportive care measures and views on OMT. Quantitative data was summarized descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 60 participants completed the interview. Participants demonstrated limited awareness of osteopathic medicine; no participant had more than "some" knowledge of OMT. After education about OMT using a brief video, all clinicians, caregivers, and 95% of patients were receptive to OMT as a supportive care option. Major themes included the following: (a) patients have uncontrolled chemotherapy side effects, (b) improved supportive care options are desired, and (c) osteopathic medicine is a favorable supportive care adjunct. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric oncology clinicians, caregivers, and patients reported a need for better management of chemotherapy-associated side effects and an interest in utilizing OMT. These findings support further investigation into the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of implementing OMT in the pediatric oncology clinical setting.

Use of decision aid to improve informed decision-making and communication with physicians on the use of oral complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among cancer patients on chemotherapy treatment: a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is often used by cancer patients and is concerning as concomitant oral CAM and chemotherapy use may result in adverse interactions and toxicities. We hypothesise that a decision aid (DA) may promote informed and rational use of oral CAM during chemotherapy, and increase patients' discussion with their oncologists on CAM use. METHODS: We randomised 240 patients initiating chemotherapy to receive DA or none. Questionnaires were administered at randomisation (visit 1), 1 month (visit 2) and 3 months (visit 3). The primary endpoint was the decisional conflict score (DCS) for decision made on CAM use during chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include patients' decision regret score (DRS) on CAM use, CAM uptake, discussion with oncologists on CAM usage, and difference in quality of life (QoL) score between CAM and non-CAM users at visit 3. RESULTS: There was no difference in the mean DCS (mean difference 2.7 [95 CI - 2.9 to 8.3, p = 0.345]) and DRS (mean difference - 0.3 [95% CI - 6.3 to 5.8, p = 0.926]) between the two arms. There was a reduction in odds of CAM usage in the intervention arm compared to control arm (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.78, p = 0.009), but there was no difference in discussion with oncologists on CAM usage (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.01, p = 0.419), or in the QoL between CAM and non-CAM users. CONCLUSION: Our DA did not reduce DCS among cancer patients on chemotherapy. DA that provides more evidence-based information on CAM, and non-judgemental discussion initiated by oncologists to discuss CAM, may improve its effectiveness.

Do the effects of acupuncture vary between acupuncturists? Analysis of the Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration individual patient data meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The degree to which the effects of acupuncture treatment vary between acupuncturists is unknown. We used a large individual patient dataset of trials of acupuncture for chronic pain to assess practitioner heterogeneity. METHODS: Individual patient data linked to identifiable acupuncturists were drawn from a dataset of 39 high-quality trials of acupuncture, where the comparators were either sham acupuncture or non-acupuncture controls, such as standard care or waitlist. Heterogeneity among acupuncturists was assessed by meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1206 acupuncturists in 13 trials were included. Statistically significant heterogeneity was found in trials with sham-control groups (p < 0.0001) and non-acupuncture control groups (p <0.0001). However, the degree of heterogeneity was very small, with the observed distribution of treatment effects virtually overlapping that expected by chance. For instance, for non-acupuncture-controlled trials, the proportion of acupuncturists with effect sizes half a standard deviation greater or less than average was expected to be 34%, but was observed to be 37%. A limitation is that the trials included a relatively limited range of acupuncturists, mainly physician-acupuncturists. DISCUSSION: Although differences in effects between acupuncturists were greater than expected by chance, the degree of variation was small. This suggests that most chronic pain patients in clinical practice would have similar results to those reported in high-quality trials; comparably, we did not find evidence to suggest that greater standardization of acupuncture practice would improve outcomes. Further research needs to be conducted exploring variability using a sample of acupuncturists with a broader range of practice styles, training and experience.

Optimizing DXA to Assess Skeletal Health: Key Concepts for Clinicians.

CONTEXT: The diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk prior to a sentinel fracture was transformed by the widespread clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This review is based on a collection of primary and review literature gathered from a PubMed search of "dual energy X-ray absorptiometry," "trabecular bone score," and "atypical femur fracture" among other keywords. PubMed searches were supplemented by the authors' prior knowledge of the subject. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: While uncertainty exists for some aspects of osteoporosis care, patient and clinician familiarity with BMD assessment for screening and monitoring is firmly established. Beyond BMD, lateral spine images obtained with DXA can diagnose osteoporosis and refine fracture risk through the detection of unrecognized vertebral fractures. In addition, analysis of DXA lumbar spine images can reflect changes in trabecular bone microarchitecture, a component of bone "quality" that predicts risk of fracture independent of BMD. Finally, monitoring of bone health by DXA may be extended to include assessment of the femoral cortices for rare but serious adverse effects associated with antiresorptive therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing technologic sophistication requires additional consideration for how DXA imaging is performed, interpreted and applied to patient care. As with any test, clinicians must be familiar with DXA performance, pitfalls in analysis, and interpretation within each clinical context in which DXA is applied. With this perspective, care providers will be well positioned to contribute to continuous improvement of DXA performance and, in turn, quality of osteoporosis care.

A role for traditional doctors in health promotion: experience from a trial of HIV prevention in Botswana.

Traditional doctors have been largely ignored in HIV prevention, particularly primary prevention. As part of a structural intervention programme to reduce HIV risk among young women in Botswana, we trained 147 traditional doctors in four districts as well as government health education assistants (HEAs) and teachers to run discussion groups in the community and schools, using an evidence-based eight-episode audio-drama, covering gender roles, gender violence, and how these are related to HIV risk. One year later, we contacted 43 of the 87 trained traditional doctors in two districts. Most (32) were running discussion groups with men and women, with links to the local HEAs and teachers. They were adept at recruiting men to their groups, often a challenge with community interventions, and reported positive changes in attitudes and behaviour of group participants. Traditional doctors can play an important role in primary prevention of gender violence and HIV.

Impact of high fidelity simulation on perceptions and professional skills in obstetrics.

BACKGROUND: In our country, the introduction of simulation as a teaching tool for obstetric emergencies is very recent. Several studies are being developed to evaluate its benefit in the continuing education of health professionals. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a continuing medical education program based on High fidelity simulation drills (HFS) on professional skills in obstetrics. METHODS: 91 Learners were able to benefit from HFS continuing education program. Mean job tenure was 7.94 years [1-40]. RESULTS: We were able to highlight a positive impact of level 1 with satisfaction rates of more than 90%. 92% of participants said they left with tools applicable in the function framework. Midwives and emergency physicians were the most satisfied. The general evaluation before the beginning of the training had revealed an average score of 7.12/20 [2/20-13/20]. The variance of scores initially obtained was significantly related to the profession of the learner (p <0.0001, R = 0.61). We found significant improvement in post-training scores (p = 0.0001) and a mean difference of +1.46 [-6, +8.66]. These results highlight a level 2 impact of HFS training on learners' knowledge.

A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System.

BACKGROUND: Physician online ratings are ubiquitous and influential, but they also have their detractors. Given the lack of scientific survey methodology used in online ratings, some health systems have begun to publish their own internal patient-submitted ratings of physicians. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare online physician ratings with internal ratings from a large healthcare system. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study comparing online ratings with internal ratings from a large healthcare system. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente, a large integrated healthcare delivery system. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians in the Southern California region of Kaiser Permanente, including all specialties with ambulatory clinic visits. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was correlation between online physician ratings and internal ratings from the integrated healthcare delivery system. RESULTS: Of 5438 physicians who met inclusion and exclusion criteria, 4191 (77.1%) were rated both online and internally. The online ratings were based on a mean of 3.5 patient reviews, while the internal ratings were based on a mean of 119 survey returns. The overall correlation between the online and internal ratings was weak (Spearman's rho .23), but increased with the number of reviews used to formulate each online rating. CONCLUSIONS: Physician online ratings did not correlate well with internal ratings from a large integrated healthcare delivery system, although the correlation increased with the number of reviews used to formulate each online rating. Given that many consumers are not aware of the statistical issues associated with small sample sizes, we would recommend that online rating websites refrain from displaying a physician's rating until the sample size is sufficiently large (for example, at least 15 patient reviews). However, hospitals and health systems may be able to provide better information for patients by publishing the internal ratings of their physicians.

An expert consensus-based guideline for the integrative anthroposophic treatment of acute gastroenteritis in children.

OBJECTIVES: Acute gastroenteritis is one of the major causes of hospital admission in childhood. The primary objective of the treatment is rehydration, but conventional drug therapies are limited. Therefore, several pediatricians supplement conventional treatment with complementary and alternative therapies. In the two German departments for pediatric integrative medicine, children suffering from an acute gastroenteritis are treated with supportive therapy based on anthroposophic medicine. However, up to now scientifically validated guidelines for these therapies are lacking. DESIGN: We consulted an expert pool of 50 physicians with expertise in anthroposophic medicine as well as pediatrics and invited them to participate in an online-based Delphi process. Results were analyzed by means of qualitative content analysis with two independent raters using MAXQDA. Using four rounds of questioning, a consensus-based guideline was developed. RESULTS: A strong consensus (>90%) or consensus (>75-90%) was achieved for 14 of 16 subsections. The guideline describes disease characteristics, the most useful diagnostics, drug as well as non-drug treatment recommendations and advises for a good physician-patient interaction. CONCLUSION: The guideline will help clinicians, as well as family doctors, in their daily routine and make anthroposophic medicine more tangible for parents and health insurance companies.

Clinical performance among recent graduates in nine low- and middle-income countries.

OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have identified large and systematic deficits in clinical care in low-income countries that are likely to limit health gains. This has focused attention on effectiveness of pre-service education. One approach to assessing this is observation of clinical performance among recent graduates providing care. However, no studies have assessed performance in a standard manner across countries. We analysed clinical performance among recently graduated providers in nine low- or middle-income countries. METHODS: Service Provision Assessments from Haiti, Kenya, Malawi, Namibia, Nepal, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, and Uganda were used. We constructed a Good Medical Practice Index that assesses completion of essential clinical actions using direct observations of care (range 0-1), calculated index scores by country and clinical cadre, and assessed the role of facility and clinical characteristics using regression analysis. RESULTS: Our sample consisted of 2223 clinicians with at least one observation of care. The Good Medical Practice score for the sample was 0.50 (SD = 0.20). Nurses and midwives had the highest score at 0.57 (SD = 0.20), followed by associate clinicians at 0.43 (SD = 0.18), and physicians at 0.42 (SD = 0.16). The average national performance varied from 0.63 (SD = 0.18) in Uganda to 0.39 (SD = 0.17) in Nepal, persisting after adjustment for facility and clinician characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: These results show substantial gaps in clinical performance among recently graduated clinicians, raising concerns about models of clinical education. Competency-based education should be considered to improve quality of care in LMICs. Observations of care offer important insight into the quality of clinical education.

OBJECTIFS: Des études récentes ont identifié des déficits importants et systématiques dans les soins cliniques dans les pays à faible revenu, susceptibles de limiter les progrès en matière de santé. Cela a attiré l'attention sur l'efficacité de la formation initiale. Une des approches permettant cette évaluation a été l'observation de la performance clinique des diplômés récents dispensant des soins. Cependant, aucune étude n'a évalué la performance de manière standard dans tous les pays. Nous avons analysé les performances cliniques de prestataires récemment diplômés dans neuf pays à revenu faible ou intermédiaire. MÉTHODES: Des évaluations de la fourniture de services en Haïti, au Kenya, au Malawi, en Namibie, au Népal, au Rwanda, au Sénégal, en Tanzanie et en Ouganda ont été utilisées. Nous avons construit un indice de bonne pratique médicale qui évalue l'achèvement des actions cliniques essentielles à l'aide d'observations directes des soins (plage de 0 à 1), calculé les scores d'index par pays et par cadre clinique, et évalué le rôle de l'établissement et des caractéristiques cliniques à l'aide d'une analyse de régression. RÉSULTATS: Notre échantillon était constitué de 2.223 cliniciens avec au moins une observation des soins. Le score de bonne pratique médicale pour l'échantillon était de 0,50 (écart-type = 0,20). Les infirmières et les sages-femmes avaient le score le plus élevé de 0,57 (écart-type = 0,20), suivies des cliniciens associés avec 0,43 (écart-type = 0,18) et des médecins avec 0,42 (écart-type = 0,16). La performance moyenne nationale variait de 0,63 (écart-type = 0,18) en Ouganda à 0,39 (écart-type = 0,17) au Népal, persistant après ajustement en fonction des caractéristiques de l'établissement et du clinicien. CONCLUSIONS: Ces résultats montrent des écarts substantiels dans les performances cliniques des cliniciens récemment diplômés, ce qui soulève des inquiétudes concernant les modèles de formation clinique. Une éducation axée sur les compétences devrait être envisagée pour améliorer la qualité des soins dans les PRFM. Les observations des soins offrent des informations importantes sur la qualité de la formation clinique.

The Bell Tolls for Homeopathy: Time for Change in the Training and Practice of North American Naturopathic Physicians.

North American naturopathic medicine is a distinct form of practice that is woven into the larger fabric of integrative medicine; in a number of US states and Canadian provinces, naturopathic doctors enjoy a wide scope of practice, including the ability to make diagnoses, order tests, use medical technology, write prescription drugs, and perform minor surgeries. However, the basic premise of naturopathic medicine and its guiding principles-considering the whole person and supporting healthy lifestyle behaviors-is the unifying approach in clinical practice. In the 1970s, homeopathy-considered in many circles to be a hypothesis-driven, fringe form of alternative medicine-became embedded into the training and practice of North American naturopathic doctors. Since the earliest days of its theory (circa 1800), homeopathy has escaped, and continues to escape, biological plausibility; however, the persistence of this modality (and the insistence by both its consumers and practitioners that it provides benefit) speaks to the role of expectations, beliefs, values, agency, context effects, and the placebo-at-large. It is our contention that the progression of professional naturopathic medicine in the 21st century requires a major transition in how it approaches the subject of homeopathy. We propose that students should be encouraged to critically analyze the tenets of homeopathy, its lesser known history, and the idea of homeopathy as a biomedicine that simply awaits untold chemicophysical mechanisms. Furthermore, the modality of homeopathy should be incorporated into the larger context of placebo studies, narrative medicine, ethics, and psychotherapeutic techniques.

Disciplinary boundaries and integrating care: using Q-methodology to understand trainee views on being a good doctor.

BACKGROUND: Rising numbers of patients with multiple-conditions and complex care needs mean that it is increasingly important for doctors from different specialty areas to work together, alongside other members of the multi-disciplinary team, to provide patient centred care. However, intra-professional boundaries and silos within the medical profession may challenge holistic approaches to patient care. METHODS: We used Q methodology to examine how postgraduate trainees (n = 38) on a range of different specialty programmes in England and Wales could be grouped based on their rankings of 40 statements about 'being a good doctor'. Themes covered in the Q-set include: generalism (breadth) and specialism (depth), interdisciplinarity and multidisciplinary team working, patient-centredness, and managing complex care needs. RESULTS: A by-person factor analysis enabled us to map distinct perspectives within our participant group (P-set). Despite high levels of overall commonality, three groups of trainees emerged, each with a clear perspective on being a good doctor. We describe the first group as 'generalists': team-players with a collegial and patient-centred approach to their role. The second group of 'general specialists' aspired to be specialists but with a generalist and patient-centred approach to care within their specialty area. Both these two groups can be contrasted to those in the third 'specialist' group, who had a more singular focus on how their specialty can help the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst distinct, the priorities and values of trainees in this study share some important aspects. The results of our Q-sort analysis suggest that it may be helpful to understand the relationship between generalism and specialism as less of a dichotomy and more of a continuum that transcends primary and secondary care settings. A nuanced understanding of trainee views on being a good doctor, across different specialties, may help us to bridge gaps and foster interdisciplinary working.

Knowledge of intrapartum care among obstetric care providers in rural Kenya.

BACKGROUND: Kenya did not meet its maternal mortality ratio (MMR) target under the Millennium Development Goals. The aim of this study was to examine the gaps in knowledge of intrapartum care among obstetric care providers (OCPs) in rural Nandi County, Kenya. METHODS: This cross-sectional study in 2015 surveyed 326 nurses, midwives, clinical officers and physicians about their knowledge, attitudes and practices related to normal labor and childbirth, immediate newborn care and management of obstetric complications. RESULTS: Self-reported intrapartum knowledge among OCPs was insufficient according to accepted international standards. The mean total knowledge score for all OCPs based on a validated 30-question inventory was 62% (range 23-90%). Only 14 providers (4%) scored as 'competent' (a score ≥80%). Scores were higher for OCPs who had received pre- and postemployment emergency obstetric care training and those with higher levels of confidence in their skills. Survey respondents identified a lack of knowledge as one of the greatest barriers to high-quality patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing training opportunities for OCPs may improve the quality of obstetric care provided to women in Kenya and other high-MMR locations in sub-Saharan Africa and enable progress toward achieving the ambitious Sustainable Development Goals target for maternal survival.

Twelve-year trend in the use of zolpidem and physicians' non-compliance with recommended duration: a Korean national health insurance database study.

OBJECTIVES: Abuse of zolpidem has sporadically been reported and little is known regarding nationwide patterns of zolpidem use in Korea. This study investigates the extent of zolpidem usage exceeding the recommended duration and the predictors. METHODS: We conducted a drug utilization study using the national sample cohort database of the Korea National Health Insurance Corporation between 2002 and 2013. The study subjects were patients treated with zolpidem in the outpatient setting. An episode was defined as a period of continuous zolpidem therapy. The provider-based episode allowed for a gap of up to 3 days between two consecutive prescriptions from the same institution. The person-based episode allowed for a gap of up to 3 days, regardless of institution. We calculated the proportion of zolpidem use for periods over 30 days and conducted logistic regression analyses to investigate the relevant predictors. An adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for each predictor. RESULTS: The usage of zolpidem is dramatically increased by approximately 18 times since zolpidem was authorized in the market (1181 in 2002 vs. 21,399 in 2013). The treatment duration in 8.3% of episodes exceeded 30 days out of 75,087 zolpidem users. The odds of zolpidem prescription exceeding 30 days were highest in patients aged 65 years and older (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.78-2.53) and at tertiary hospitals (aOR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.68-2.72). Women were more likely than men to be treated with zolpidem for over 30 days. CONCLUSION: We found dramatic increase of zolpidem use from 2002 to 2013. In 8.3% of the prescribed episodes of zolpidem, the recommended duration was exceeded. Efforts are required to reduce prescriptions that are inconsistent with the recommended guidelines for older patients, women, and in tertiary hospitals.

The interrater reliability of static palpation of the thoracic spine for eliciting tenderness and stiffness to test for a manipulable lesion.

Background: Despite widespread use by manual therapists, there is little evidence regarding the reliability of thoracic spine static palpation to test for a manipulable lesion using stiffness or tenderness as diagnostic markers. We aimed to determine the interrater agreement of thoracic spine static palpation for segmental tenderness and stiffness and determine the effect of standardised training for examiners. The secondary aim was to explore expert consensus on the level of segmental tenderness required to locate a "manipulable lesion". Methods: Two experienced chiropractors used static palpation of thoracic vertebrae on two occasions (pragmatic and standardised approaches). Participants rated tenderness on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and raters judged segmental stiffness based on their experience and perception of normal mobility with the requested outcomes of hypomobile or normal mobility. We calculated interrater agreement using percent agreement, Cohen's Kappa coefficients ( κ ) and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa coefficients (PABAK). In a preliminary study, an expert panel of 10 chiropractors took part in a Delphi process to identify the level of meaningful segmental tenderness required to locate a "manipulable lesion". Results: Thirty-six participants (20 female) were enrolled for the reliability study on the 13th March 2017. Mean (SD) age was 22.4 (3.4) years with an equal distribution of asymptomatic (n = 17) and symptomatic (n = 17) participants. Overall, the interrater agreement for spinal segmental stiffness had Kappa values indicating less than chance agreement [ κ range - 0.11, 0.53]. When adjusted for prevalence and bias, the PABAK ranged from slight to substantial agreement [0.12-0.76] with moderate or substantial agreement demonstrated at the majority of spinal levels (T1, T2 and T6 to T12). Generally, there was fair to substantial agreement for segmental tenderness [Kappa range 0.22-0.77]. Training did not significantly improve interrater agreement for stiffness or tenderness. The Delphi process indicated that an NPRS score of 2 out of 10 identified a potential "manipulable lesion". Conclusion: Static palpation was overall moderately reliable for the identification of segmental thoracic spine stiffness and tenderness, with tenderness demonstrating a higher reliability. Also, an increased agreement was found within the mid-thoracic spine. A brief training intervention failed to improve reliability.

Impact of electronic and blended learning programs for manual perineal support on incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a prospective interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are associated with anal incontinence, dyspareunia and perineal pain. Bimanual perineal support technique (bPST) prevents OASIS. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of two different bPST training-methods on OASIS incidence. METHODS: This is a prospective-interventional quality improvement study conducted in two Palestinian maternity units between June 1 2015 and December 31 2016. Women having spontaneous or operative vaginal-delivery at ≥24 gestational-weeks or a birthweight of ≥1000 g (n = 1694) were recruited and examined vaginally and rectally immediately after vaginal birth by a trained assessor. Data on baseline OASIS incidence were collected during Phase-1 of the study. Subsequently, birth attendants in both maternity units were trained in bPST using two training modalities. A self-directed electronic-learning (e-learning) using an animated video was launched in phase-2 followed by a blended learning method (the animated e-learning video+ structured face-to-face training) in phase-3. OASIS incidence was monitored during phases-2 and 3. Variations in OASIS incidence between the three phases were assessed using Pearson-χ2-test (or Fisher's-Exact-test). The impact of each training-method on OASIS incidence was assessed using logistic-regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1694 women were included; 376 in phase-1, 626 in phase-2 and 692 in phase-3. Compared to Phase-1, OASIS incidence was reduced by 45% (12.2 to 6.7%, aOR: 0.56, CI; 0.35-0.91, p = 0.018) and 74% (12.2 to 3.2%, aOR, 0.29, CI; 0.17-0.50, p < 0.001) in phases-2 and 3, respectively. There was also a significant reduction in OASIS incidence by 52% from phase-2 to phase-3 (6.7% (42/626) to 3.2% (22/692), p = 0.003). These reductions reached statistical significance among parous-women only (aOR: 0.18, CI; 0.07-0.49, p = 0.001) after the first training method tested in phase-2. However, the reduction was significant among both primiparous (aOR: 0.39, CI; 0.21-0.74, p = 0.004) and parous-women (aOR: 0.11, CI; 0.04-0.32, p < 0.001) after implementing the blended learning method in phase-3. CONCLUSION: The animated e-learning video had a positive impact on reducing OASIS incidence. However, this reduction was enhanced by the use of a blended learning program combining both e- learning and face-to-face training modalities. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrialo.gov identifier: NCT02427854 , date: 28 April 2015.

The use of traditional and complementary medicine among diabetes patients, and the awareness and attitudes of physicians.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and reasons for use of traditional and complimentary medicines in diabetic patients, and the attitudes and behaviours of physicians towards the issue. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2015 to April 2016 at Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey, and comprised people aged 18 or more with an existing diagnosis of diabetes. A semi-structured questionnaire was used as the data-collection tool.. RESULTS: There were 386 respondents, and 179(46.4%) of them said they had used at least one type of traditional and complimentary medicine related to their diabetic condition. A significant relationship was noted between such usage and age, educational level, type of diabetes, monthly income, duration of diabetes, diabetic complications, gylcated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels <10 and ?10, and prescribed treatment. Besides, 135(75.41%) participants said they had not discussed their use of traditional and complimentary medicines with their physicians. CONCLUSIONS: When evaluating diabetic patients, physicians should ask their patients about their use of traditional and complimentary medicines, and should provide them with detailed information on the subject.

Obstetrics knowledge and skills training as a catalyst for change.

BACKGROUND: Poor emergency obstetric care has been shown by national confidential enquiries into maternal deaths to contribute to a number of maternal deaths in South Africa. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether a structured training course can improve knowledge and skills and whether this can influence the capacity of a healthcare facility to provide basic and comprehensive emergency obstetric care signal functions. METHODS: A baseline survey was conducted to assess the seven basic emergency obstetric and neonatal care signal functions in 51 community health centres (CHCs) and the nine comprehensive emergency care signal functions in 62 district hospitals (DHs). A re-assessment was conducted 1 year after saturation training had been provided in each district. The delegates were trained using a structured training programme (Essential Steps in Managing Obstetric Emergencies, ESMOE) and their knowledge and skills were tested before and after the training. Saturation training was considered to have been achieved once 80% of the healthcare professionals involved in maternity care had been trained. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the knowledge and skills of doctors, namely by 16.8% and 32.8%, respectively, of advanced midwives by 13.7% and 29.0%, and of professional nurses with midwifery by 16.1% and 31.2%. The seven basic emergency care functions improved from 60.8% to 67.8% in the CHCs and from 90.7% to 92.5% in the DHs before and after training. If the two signal functions that are not within the scope of practice of professional nurses with midwifery are excluded (viz. assisted delivery and manual vacuum aspiration), the functionality of CHCs increased from 85.1% to 94.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The ESMOE training programme improved knowledge and skills, but there was a modest improvement in the functionality of the facilities. Improvement in functionality requires changes in the structure of the health system, including changing the scope of practice of professional nurses with midwifery and employing more advanced midwives in CHCs.

Practice Drift: Are There Risks When Integrative Medicine Physicians Exceed Their Scope?

Editor´s Note: This is the third commentary from the JACM column partnership with the Osher Collaborative for IntegrativeMedicine. These quarterly columns from leaders of the seven prominent academic centers that constitute the Collaborative are meant to stimulate and enliven thinking about the paradigm, practice, and policy to advance integrative health. In this column, two members at the Osher Center for Integrative Medicine in Chicago, Illinois and San Francisco, California, take on a challenge pioneering field face as they move from the Wild West into professional formation. Their focus is on the mosaic of integrative practices of medical doctors. The lead author hails from an integrative medicine base that is known for its clinical program. Osher Northwestern executive director Melinda Ring, MD, FACP, Clinical Associate Professor of Integrative Medicine, is also a member of the Board of Directors of the American Board of Integrative Medicine, that has set the prevailing standard for board certification. Ring´s coauthor, Sandy Newmark, MD, FAAP, holds the position of Osher Foundation Endowed Chair in Clinical Programs in Integrative Medicine at the UCSF Osher Center. Newmark is also head of that Center´s Pediatric Integrative Neurodevelopmental Program. -John Weeks, Editor-in-Chief, JACM.

Video analysis for the evaluation of vaginal births: a prospective observational study.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: Video documentation is nowadays well established in many fields of medicine, but mostly in unreal situations such as simulation training. We here present the application of video for teaching and learning purposes during the birth process. The aim of video documentation during labour is to provide an observational tool for obstetric care by midwives and obstetricians, with the opportunity for evaluation and education afterwards, especially in absence of the woman in labour and her family. METHODS: Between February 2015 and June 2017, we conducted a prospective observational study on women aged over 18 years with singleton pregnancies with vertex presentation at term, who gave birth vaginally in the labour ward at the Division of Obstetrics of the University Hospital of Zurich. The end of birth (crowning of the head and fetal extraction) with the manual actions and manoeuvers performed was recorded on video in 100 births. Procedures were analysed afterwards by a senior consultant and evaluated with the staff involved. RESULTS: We found frequent notable omissions during vaginal deliveries, concerning technical and nontechnical skills. Those aspects included inappropriate aseptic technique (e.g., no sterile underlay or sterile gloves), improper fetal head slowdown during expulsion, lack of visualisation of the perineum during fetal extraction/expulsion, lack of hip, shoulder and arm guiding while extracting the fetus, inappropriate episiotomy technique (wrong handling of the scissors, cutting angle too steep) and improper communication between the woman giving birth and the staff. During vacuum extractions, incorrect positioning of the cup, and inappropriate direction of pulling and handling of the cup were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Video analysis of obstetric procedures in the labour ward is an easily applicable and very useful tool for teaching and learning purposes. It contributes to showing and improving the quality of procedures and the interactions of the staff and can be used for staff evaluation.